24 July 2017 – 23 August 2017

The exhibits correspond to discrete system outputs, system states, and user-initiated actions as recorded within platform interfaces and associated notification systems.

Only materials directly reflecting the operation of the Content ID claim process within this period are included.

Exhibit 1 — Claim Instantiation

Type: System Output
Date: 24 July 2017

Initial system-generated notification indicating that a Content ID claim has been applied to the video.

Records:

• Identification of matched content
• Attribution of the claim to claimant entities
• Claim notification presented within the platform interface
• Automated email notification of claim
• Associated email transmission metadata

System Behaviour Reflected:
The system registers a claim following automated content matching and generates corresponding interface and email-based notifications.

→ View Full Exhibit

Exhibit 2 — Match Identification and Monetisation

Type: System Output / System State
Date: 24 July 2017

System output identifying a matched segment of the video and the associated monetisation status applied to the claimant.

Records:

• Matched segment duration (0:50 – 2:42; 1 minute 52 seconds)
• Position of match within the video
• Identification of reference content
• Monetisation status applied to claimant
• Statement indicating advertisements may appear on the video

System Behaviour Reflected:
The system identifies a segment as matching reference material and applies monetisation rules assigning revenue to the claimant.

→ View Full Exhibit

Exhibit 3 — Dispute Submission

Type: User Action / System Output
Date: 24 July 2017

Submission of a dispute by the uploader through the platform interface, with associated system confirmations and process definitions.

Records:

• Selection of claim for dispute
• Stated basis for dispute
• User confirmation statements required by the system
• Interface confirmation of submission
• System confirmation that the dispute was successfully submitted
• System statement that the claimant will review the dispute
• System statement that the user will be notified of the outcome
• System statement indicating that the claimant has up to 30 days to review and take action
• Email confirmation of dispute receipt

System Behaviour Reflected:
The system accepts a user-initiated dispute, generates confirmation outputs, and defines a time-bound review process assigned to the claimant, including an expected future notification.

→ View Full Exhibit

Exhibit 4 — Dispute Active State

Type: System State
Date: 24 July 2017 – 23 August 2017

System condition indicating that the claim remains active while the dispute is under review.

Records:

• System label indicating the claim is being disputed
• Continued application of claim conditions during the review period
• Interface restriction indicating limited editing functionality
• Reference to the defined review period

System Behaviour Reflected:
The system maintains the claim and associated conditions during the defined claimant review period while indicating an active dispute state.

→ View Full Exhibit

Exhibit Summary

The exhibits above document observable system outputs, system states, and user-initiated actions recorded within a defined 30-day claim lifecycle.

They record:

- the instantiation of a Content ID claim
- the identification of matched content and application of monetisation
- the submission of a dispute and associated system confirmations
- the definition of a claimant review period of up to 30 days
- the persistence of the claim during that period
- the system-defined expectation of a notification outcome

No interpretation is assigned to these events.
No attribution of intent or responsibility is made.

The material is presented as a structured record of system behaviour.

→ View Case Record

→ Read the Investigation

→ What is Content ID?

Contact

contact@mechanicalpublishing.com